Why the study?
The effects of GRK2 inhibition on myocardial metabolism in heart failure were uncharted.
Does pharmacological inhibition of GRK2 by C7 improve cardiac metabolism and function in experimental heart failure mice?
Does pharmacological inhibition of GRK2 by C7 improve cardiac metabolism and function in experimental heart failure mice?
Pharmacological inhibition of GRK2 with the cyclic peptide C7 improves cardiac metabolism, mitochondrial function, and contractility in a murine model of heart failure.
C7 improves metabolism and contractility in HF mice; hypothesis-generating for GRK2 inhibition, human trials required.
AIMS: The effects of GRK2 inhibition on myocardial metabolism in heart failure (HF) are unchartered. In this work, we evaluated the impact of pharmacological inhibition of GRK2 by a cyclic peptide, C7, on metabolic, biochemical, and functional phenotypes in experimental HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: C7 was initially tested on adult mice ventricular myocyte from wild type and GRK2 myocardial deficient mice (GRK2-cKO), to assess the selectivity on GRK2 inhibition. Then, chronic infusion of 2 mg/kg/day of C7 was performed in HF mice with cryogenic myocardial infarction. Cardiac function in vivo was assessed by echocardiography and cardiac catheterization. Histological, biochemical, and metabolic studies were performed on heart samples at time points. C7 induces a significant increase of contractility in wild type but not in adult ventricle myocytes from GRK2-cKO mice, thus confirming C7 selectivity for GRK2. In HF mice, 4 weeks of treatment with C7 improved metabolic features, including mitochondrial organization and function, and restored the biochemical and contractile responses. CONCLUSIONS: GRK2 is a critical molecule in the physiological regulation of cardiac metabolism. Its alterations in the failing heart can be pharmacologically targeted, leading to the correction of metabolic and functional abnormalities observed in HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ciccarelli et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: