Why the study?
Does a double cannulation approach allow for successful coronary venous lead placement in a patient with a prominent Thebesian valve?
Does a double cannulation approach allow for successful coronary venous lead placement in a patient with a prominent Thebesian valve?
A double cannulation approach using an alternate venous route can overcome a prominent Thebesian valve obstructing coronary sinus cannulation during CRT implantation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support double cannulation for Thebesian valve obstruction during CRT; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
We report identification of a prominent Thebesian valve by cardiovascular computed tomography (CT) angiography impeding cannulation of the coronary sinus, with subsequent successful coronary venous lead placement with cannulation of the coronary sinus ostium via a transvenous femoral vein approach and subsequent cannulation of the ostium with the coronary venous lead with a left subclavian approach. A 57-year-old man with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, New York Heart Association Class III heart failure, left bundle branch block, and an ejection fraction of 15%, underwent an attempted cardiac resynchronization therapy implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD). As the coronary sinus ostium could not be cannulated, a dual chamber ICD was placed. The patient subsequently underwent cardiovascular CT angiography, which identified a prominent Thebesian valve at the coronary sinus ostium as the anatomic obstacle to cannulation. Reattempted transvenous cardiac resynchronization therapy was accomplished successfully with a double cannulation approach: cannulation of the coronary sinus ostium with a catheter via a transvenous femoral vein approach and subsequent cannulation with the coronary venous lead via a left subclavian approach. When a prominent Thebesian valve is identified as an obstacle to transvenous left ventricular lead placement, cannulation of the coronary sinus by an alternate venous approach may allow for a coronary venous route rather than necessitate an epicardial approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cao et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: