Why the study?
To assess the consistency and mechanisms underlying the 5-year reduction in death from coronary heart disease or nonfatal myocardial infarction seen with coronary CTA in stable chest pain.
Does the addition of coronary CTA to standard care reduce the composite of death from coronary heart disease or nonfatal myocardial infarction in patients with stable chest pain?
Does the addition of coronary CTA to standard care reduce the composite of death from coronary heart disease or nonfatal myocardial infarction in patients with stable chest pain?
The use of coronary CTA in patients with stable chest pain improves long-term clinical outcomes by enabling better targeting of preventative treatments.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports coronary CTA for stable chest pain evaluation; confirms lower long-term hard endpoint rates in RCT.
BACKGROUND: Within the SCOT-HEART (Scottish COmputed Tomography of the HEART Trial) trial of patients with stable chest pain, the use of coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) reduced the rate of death from coronary heart disease or nonfatal myocardial infarction (primary endpoint). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the consistency and mechanisms of the 5-year reduction in this endpoint. METHODS: In this open-label trial, 4,146 participants were randomized to standard care alone or standard care plus coronary CTA. This study explored the primary endpoint by symptoms, diagnosis, coronary revascularizations, and preventative therapies. RESULTS: Event reductions were consistent across symptom and risk categories (p = NS for interactions). In patients who were not diagnosed with angina due to coronary heart disease, coronary CTA was associated with a lower primary endpoint incidence rate (0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.13 to 0.35 vs. 0.59; 95% CI: 0.42 to 0.80 per 100 patient-years; p < 0.001). In those who had undergone coronary CTA, rates of coronary revascularization were higher in the first year (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.21; 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.46; p = 0.042) but lower beyond 1 year (HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.38 to 0.90; p = 0.015). Patients assigned to coronary CTA had higher rates of preventative therapies throughout follow-up (p < 0.001 for all), with rates highest in those with CT-defined coronary artery disease. Modeling studies demonstrated the plausibility of the observed effect size. CONCLUSIONS: The beneficial effect of coronary CTA on outcomes is consistent across subgroups with plausible underlying mechanisms. Coronary CTA improves coronary heart disease outcomes by enabling better targeting of preventative treatments to those with coronary artery disease. (Scottish COmputed Tomography of the HEART Trial [SCOT-HEART]; NCT01149590).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adamson et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: