Key result
Initial investigation of suspected stable coronary artery disease using coronary CTA significantly reduced myocardial infarction compared to usual care (rate ratio 0.69; 95% CI 0.49-0.98; P=0.038).
Why the study?
Does coronary CTA reduce myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality compared to usual care in patients with suspected stable coronary artery disease?
Population
14,817 patients with suspected stable coronary artery disease/stable chest pain
Comparison
Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) vs Usual care with various functional testing…
Design
Meta-analysis
Authors
Loading...
Supports CTA-first strategy in suspected stable CAD; reinforces randomized evidence for MI reduction.
Meta-Analysis (n=14,817)
Yes
Does coronary CTA reduce myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality compared to usual care in patients with suspected stable coronary artery disease?
Relative Risk: 0.69 (95% CI 0.49–0.98)
p-value: p=0.038
In patients with suspected stable CAD, initial evaluation with coronary CTA reduces the rate of myocardial infarction compared to usual care, though it increases the incidence of coronary revascularization without affecting all-cause mortality.
Bittencourt et al. (2016) conducted a meta-analysis in suspected stable coronary artery disease (n=14,817). Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) vs. Usual care was evaluated on Myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality (rate ratio 0.69, 95% CI 0.49-0.98, p=0.038). Initial investigation of suspected stable coronary artery disease using coronary CTA significantly reduced myocardial infarction compared to usual care (rate ratio 0.69; 95% CI 0.49-0.98; P=0.038).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: