Why the study?
Does the A-638G polymorphism of the RGS2 gene influence blood pressure reduction in response to azelnidipine or temocapril in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes?
Does the A-638G polymorphism of the RGS2 gene influence blood pressure reduction in response to azelnidipine or temocapril in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The A-638G polymorphism of the RGS2 gene may serve as a predictive factor for the blood pressure-lowering response to calcium channel blockers in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes.
We performed a prospective study to examine the genetic effect on the response to a calcium (Ca) channel blocker, azelnidipine and an ACE inhibitor, temocapril treatment in patients with hypertension, as a part of the prior clinical trial, the Azelnidipine and Temocapril in Hypertensive Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Study (ATTEST). Methods and Results. All subjects who gave informed consent for genetic research were divided into two groups: the subjects treated with azelnidipine or temocapril, for 52 weeks. We selected 18 susceptible genes for hypertension and determined their genotypes using TaqMan PCR method. RNA samples were extracted from peripheral blood, and quantitative real time PCR for all genes was performed using TaqMan method. One of the polymorphisms of the RGS2 gene was extracted as being able to influence the effect of these treatments to reduce BP. At eight weeks, BP change showed a significant interaction between the A-638G polymorphism of Regulator of G protein signaling-2 (RGS2) gene and treatment with azelnidipine or temocapril. There was no gene whose expression was associated with BP phenotypes or the polymorphisms of each gene. Conclusions. A-638G polymorphism of the RGS-2 gene could be a predictive factor for therapeutic performance of Ca channel blockers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sugimoto et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: