Key result
CCBs increase adverse CV outcomes ~135% vs BBs in white patients with the CACNB2 GG genotype.
Why the study?
Does genetic variation in CACNB2 influence the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients with CAD treated with a CCB versus BB strategy?
RCT (n=5,598)
randomized
Yes
Does genetic variation in CACNB2 influence the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients with CAD treated with a CCB versus BB strategy?
Hazard Ratio: 2.35 (95% CI 1.19–4.66)
p-value: p=0.014
Genetic variation in the CACNB2 gene (rs2357928) may influence whether hypertensive patients with CAD have better cardiovascular outcomes with a beta-blocker or calcium channel blocker strategy.
May suggest avoiding CCBs versus BBs in white CACNB2 GG carriers; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the regulatory β2 subunit of the voltage-gated calcium channel (CACNB2) may contribute to variable treatment response to antihypertensive drugs and adverse cardiovascular outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: SNPs in CACNB2 from 60 ethnically diverse individuals were identified and characterized. Three common SNPs (rs2357928, rs7069292, and rs61839258) and a genome-wide association study-identified intronic SNP (rs11014166) were genotyped for a clinical association study in 5598 hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease randomized to a β-blocker (BB) or a calcium channel blocker (CCB) treatment strategy in the INternational VErapamil SR-Trandolapril STudy GENEtic Substudy (INVEST-GENES). Reporter gene assays were conducted on the promoter SNP, showing association with clinical outcomes. Twenty-one novel SNPs were identified. A promoter A>G SNP (rs2357928) was found to have significant interaction with treatment strategy for adverse cardiovascular outcomes (P for interaction, 0.002). In whites, rs2357928 GG patients randomized to CCB were more likely to experience an adverse outcome than those randomized to BB treatment strategy, with adjusted hazard ratio (HR) (CCB versus BB) of 2.35 (95% CI, 1.19 to 4.66; P=0.014). There was no evidence for such treatment difference in AG (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.79; P=0.69) and AA (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.36 to 1.11; P=0.11) patients. This finding was consistent in Hispanics and blacks. CACNB2 rs11014166 showed similar pharmacogenetic effect in Hispanics, but not in whites or blacks. Reporter assay analysis of rs2357928 showed a significant increase in promoter activity for the G allele compared to the A allele. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that genetic variation within CACNB2 may influence treatment-related outcomes in high-risk patients with hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Niu et al. (2010) conducted an RCT in Hypertension and coronary artery disease (n=5,598). Calcium channel blocker (CCB) treatment strategy vs. Beta-blocker (BB) treatment strategy was evaluated on Adverse cardiovascular outcomes (HR 2.35, 95% CI 1.19 to 4.66, p=0.014). In white patients with the CACNB2 rs2357928 GG genotype, calcium channel blockers increased the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes compared to beta-blockers (HR 2.35; 95% CI 1.19-4.66; P=0.014).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: