Key result
The CACNA1C rs1051375 A/A genotype was associated with a 46% reduction in the primary outcome with verapamil SR compared to atenolol (OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.32-0.92; interaction P=0.0001).
Why the study?
Does verapamil SR compared to atenolol improve outcomes in hypertensive patients with stable coronary artery disease based on CACNA1C genotype?
Case-Control
Yes
Does verapamil SR compared to atenolol improve outcomes in hypertensive patients with stable coronary artery disease based on CACNA1C genotype?
Odds Ratio: 0.54 (95% CI 0.32–0.92)
p-value: p=0.0001
The CACNA1C rs1051375 polymorphism identifies hypertensive patients with stable CAD who may preferentially benefit from either verapamil SR or atenolol.
May support genotype-guided verapamil SR preference in hypertensive CAD; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: The gene encoding the target of calcium channel blockers, the alpha1c-subunit of the L-type calcium channel (CACNA1C), has not been well characterized, and only small pharmacogenetic studies testing this gene have been published to date. METHODS AND RESULTS: Resequencing of CACNA1C was performed followed by a nested case-control study of the INternational VErapamil SR/trandolapril STudy (INVEST) GENEtic Substudy (INVEST-GENES). Of 46 polymorphisms identified, 8 were assessed in the INVEST-GENES. Rs1051375 was found to have a significant interaction with treatment strategy (P=0.0001). Rs1051375 A/A genotype was associated with a 46% reduction in the primary outcome among those randomized to verapamil SR treatment, when compared with atenolol treatment (odds ratio 0.54 95% CI 0.32 to 0.92). In heterozygous A/G individuals, there was no difference in the occurrence of the primary outcome when randomized to verapamil SR versus atenolol treatment (odds ratio 1.47 95% CI 0.86 to 2.53), whereas homozygous G/G individuals had a greater than 4-fold increased risk of the primary outcome with verapamil treatment compared with those randomized to atenolol treatment (odds ratio 4.59 95% CI 1.67 to 12.67). We did not identify allelic expression imbalance or differences in mRNA expression in heart tissue by rs1051375 genotype. CONCLUSIONS: Variation in CACNA1C is associated with treatment response among hypertensive patients with stable coronary artery disease. Our data suggest a genetically defined group of patients that benefit most from calcium channel blocker therapy, a group that benefits most from beta-blocker therapy, and a third group in which calcium channel blocker and beta-blocker therapy are equivalent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beitelshees et al. (2009) conducted a case-control in Hypertension with stable coronary artery disease. Verapamil SR vs. Atenolol was evaluated on Primary outcome (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.32-0.92, p=0.0001). The CACNA1C rs1051375 A/A genotype was associated with a 46% reduction in the primary outcome with verapamil SR compared to atenolol (OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.32-0.92; interaction P=0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: