Why the study?
Pathological processes cause permanent morphological heart muscle remodelling leading to chronic heart failure, prompting investigation into right ventricular remodelling in arterial hypertension.
Microscopic evaluation of post-mortem hearts from patients without primary cardiac death does not clearly show right ventricular remodeling, raising questions about the mechanisms of early RV dysfunction in arterial hypertension.
Post-mortem microscopy does not confirm RV remodeling; leaves open mechanisms of early RV dysfunction in hypertension.
BACKGROUND: In the case of long-term and physiological loads (e.g. during pregnancy or regular athletics training), reversible morphological changes occur in the heart - cardiomyocytes undergo hypertrophy; however, this is not accompanied by impairment of left ventricular function or myocyte metabolism. However, in the course of various pathological processes, as time goes by, gradually permanent morphological changes occur. These changes are referred to as remodelling of the heart muscle, which, regardless of the primary cause, can lead to the development of chronic heart failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was performed on post-mortem material of 35 human hearts obtained from forensic sections and anatomopathological sections of people who died of non-cardiac causes (mainly traffic accidents, suicide attempts, strokes, acute infections); material was fixed in a 4% formalin solution. The hearts were subjected to macro- and microscopic assessment. During microscopic assessment the features of remodelling were evaluated. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: In vivo and echocardiographic tests, as well as macroscopic evaluation of post-mortem material, suggest the presence of some kind of right ventricular muscle remodelling; however, classic microscopic observations, presented in this study, do not provide such unambiguous evidence. Thus, the question arises: why and how the right ventricular function is disturbed, sometimes at early stages of arterial hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kosiński et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: