Why the study?
Does higher HbA1c level increase the risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality in subjects without known diabetes?
Does higher HbA1c level increase the risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality in subjects without known diabetes?
Higher HbA1c levels (>5.7%) are associated with increased all-cause and CVD mortality in subjects without known diabetes, primarily driven by those with undiagnosed diabetes or prediabetes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support HbA1c monitoring for mortality risk in non-diabetics; leaves open need for interventional trials.
Whether HbA1c levels are associated with mortality in subjects without known diabetes remains controversial. Moreover, the shape of the dose-response relationship on this topic is unclear. Therefore, a dose-response meta-analysis was conducted. PubMed and EMBASE were searched. Summary hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Twelve studies were included. The summary HR per 1% increase in HbA1c level was 1.03 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.01-1.04] for all-cause mortality, 1.05 [95% CI = 1.02-1.07) for cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality, and 1.02 (95% CI = 0.99-1.07) for cancer mortality. After excluding subjects with undiagnosed diabetes, the aforementioned associations remained significant for CVD mortality only. After further excluding subjects with prediabetes, all aforementioned associations presented non-significance. Evidence of a non-linear association between HbA1c and mortality from all causes, CVD and cancer was found (all Pnon-linearity < 0.05). The dose-response curves were relatively flat for HbA1c less than around 5.7%, and rose steeply thereafter. In conclusion, higher HbA1c level is associated with increased mortality from all causes and CVD among subjects without known diabetes. However, this association is driven by those with undiagnosed diabetes or prediabetes. The results regarding cancer mortality should be treated with caution due to limited studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhong et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: