Key result
Mobile phone-based interventions modestly reduce hospital length of stay in chronic heart failure.
Why the study?
Mobile phone-based interventions are increasingly used in heart failure, but their effects on health outcomes remain unclear.
Do mobile phone-based interventions improve health outcomes in adult patients with heart failure?
Meta-Analysis (n=2,534)
Do mobile phone-based interventions improve health outcomes in adult patients with heart failure?
Mobile phone-based voice call interventions significantly reduce the length of hospital stays in heart failure patients, though overall mobile interventions did not significantly improve mortality or readmissions.
Voice-call interventions may shorten HF hospital stays; leaves broader mobile health effects on mortality and readmissions open.
Mobile phone-based interventions are increasingly used to prevent adverse health outcomes in heart failure patients. However, the effects of mobile phone-based interventions on the health outcomes of heart failure patients remain unclear. Our review aims to synthesize the randomized controlled trials (RCT) of mobile phone-based interventions for heart failure patients and identify the intervention features that are most effective. Electronic searches of RCTs published from January 2000 to July 2019 were conducted. Primary outcomes included all-cause mortality, readmission, emergency department visits, length of hospital stays, and quality of life. Secondary outcomes were self-care behaviors, including medication adherence and other clinical outcomes. A total of eight studies with varying methodological quality met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Voice call intervention was more frequently used compared with telemonitoring and short message services. Our meta-analysis showed that voice call interventions had significant effects on the length of hospital stays. However, no significant effects on all-cause mortality, readmission, emergency department visits, or quality of life were found. Compared to other mobile phone-based interventions, voice calls were more effective in reducing the length of hospital stay. Future studies are needed to identify which features of mobile phone-based intervention most effectively improve health outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Son et al. (2020) conducted a meta-analysis in Chronic Heart Failure (n=2,534). Mobile phone-based interventions vs. Standard care was evaluated on Length of hospital stay (SMD -0.166, 95% CI -0.287 to -0.145). Mobile phone-based interventions significantly reduced the length of hospital stays for patients with chronic heart failure (SMD -0.166).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: