Why the study?
Does carotid stenosis ≥50% predict stroke risk, and does carotid endarterectomy reduce stroke incidence in asymptomatic and nonhemispheric patients?
Does carotid stenosis ≥50% predict stroke risk, and does carotid endarterectomy reduce stroke incidence in asymptomatic and nonhemispheric patients?
Carotid stenosis ≥50% is a significant predictor of stroke and cardiac mortality, and prophylactic carotid endarterectomy significantly reduces stroke risk in these patients, especially when considering age and hypertension.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
≥50% stenosis flags higher stroke risk where endarterectomy may help; leaves open need for randomized confirmation before practice change.
Based on the assumption that greater than or equal to 50% stenosis of the internal carotid artery increases stroke risk, noninvasive tests are being used to screen patients for prophylactic carotid endarterectomy. To assess the validity of this concept, 104 asymptomatic and 190 nonhemispheric patients referred for cerebrovascular tests were reviewed after 5 years. Carotid stenosis greater than or equal to 50% predicted a 15% stroke incidence at 2 years compared to a 3% incidence with 1-49% stenosis (p less than or equal to 0.05). Five-year cumulative stroke incidence was 21% with greater than 50% stenosis, 14% with 1-49% stenosis (NS), and 9% with 0% stenosis (p less than 0.05). Stenosis greater than or equal to 50% predicted increased cardiac mortality (p less than 0.025). Hypertensive patients, greater than 70 years, with greater than or equal to 50% stenosis had a 37% incidence of stroke; normotensive patients, less than 70 years, with or without stenosis, had few strokes. In patients with greater than or equal to 50% disease, surgery reduced the 5-year stroke rate from 21 to 8% (p less than 0.05), mitigated the effects of age and hypertension, and improved survival. Noninvasive test results must be considered in conjunction with age and hypertension in predicting stroke risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moore et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: