Key result
Each additional metabolic syndrome component was associated with a 0.17 SD higher heart rate and significant alterations in other electrocardiographic markers of subclinical cardiovascular disease.
Why the study?
Is metabolic syndrome and its components associated with electrocardiographic markers of subclinical cardiovascular disease in a population without pre-existing CVD?
Cross-Sectional (n=6,114)
No
Is metabolic syndrome and its components associated with electrocardiographic markers of subclinical cardiovascular disease in a population without pre-existing CVD?
Effect estimate: 0.17 SD (95% CI 0.15, 0.19)
Metabolic syndrome and its individual components, particularly abdominal obesity, are associated with subtle ECG changes indicative of subclinical cardiovascular disease, highlighting the importance of risk factor management even in non-obese individuals.
MetS severity signals subclinical ECG changes; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
The metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components are well-established risk factors for cardiovascular diseases (CVD). It is inconclusive whether MetS and MetS score are associated with electrocardiographic markers of subclinical CVD, therefore we investigated this in a population without pre-existing CVD. We performed a cross-sectional analysis in the Netherlands Epidemiology of Obesity study, a population-based cohort including 6671 participants aged 45–65. We excluded participants with pre-existing CVD (n = 499) or missing MetS components (n = 58). MetS was defined based on a modified definition of Adult Treatment Panel III. Subclinical CVD parameters were determined with 12-lead ECGs. MetS score was defined as number of abnormal MetS components and obesity as Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2. We performed weighted adjusted linear regression analyses. Our study population (n = 6114) had a mean (SD) BMI of 26.3 (4.4) kg/m2 and MetS was present in 24% of participants. All ECG parameters differed between participants with and without MetS. Per additional MetS component, heart rate was 0.17 SD (95% CI 0.15, 0.19) higher, P wave duration, QRS complex duration and corrected QT interval were longer [0.07 SD (0.05, 0.10), 0.04 SD (0.01, 0.06) and 0.05 SD (0.02, 0.08) respectively], P wave axis, T wave axis and QRS axis were lower [−0.10 SD (−0.12, −0.07), −0.07 SD (−0.10, −0.05) and −0.19 SD (−0.22, −0.16)] and percentage small Q-waves also increased per additional MetS component. Associations were stronger in non-obese than obese participants. In joint modelling of all MetS components, increased waist circumference showed strongest associations with ECG parameters. Metabolic syndrome score and its individual components, in particular abdominal obesity, are associated with ECG markers of subclinical CVD, showing the importance of limiting the amount of MetS components in both obese and non-obese persons.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elffers et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Metabolic syndrome (n=6,114). Metabolic syndrome components vs. Fewer or no metabolic syndrome components was evaluated on Heart rate (per additional metabolic syndrome component) (0.17 SD, 95% CI 0.15, 0.19). Each additional metabolic syndrome component was associated with a 0.17 SD higher heart rate and significant alterations in other electrocardiographic markers of subclinical cardiovascular disease.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: