Key result
Direct discharge of cancer patients with PE linked to ~92% lower 14-day mortality vs hospitalization.
Why the study?
It was unclear how often cancer patients with acute pulmonary embolism are discharged directly from the emergency department or outpatient clinic and whether direct discharge is safe.
Is direct discharge safe compared to hospitalization in cancer patients with acute symptomatic and incidental pulmonary embolism?
Cohort (n=602)
Yes
Is direct discharge safe compared to hospitalization in cancer patients with acute symptomatic and incidental pulmonary embolism?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.7% vs 9%
A substantial proportion of cancer patients with acute symptomatic or incidental pulmonary embolism can be safely discharged directly from the emergency department or outpatient clinic, with very low rates of early mortality and PE-related readmission.
May support selective direct discharge in cancer-associated PE; leaves open need for RCTs to exclude selection bias.
BACKGROUND: It is unclear how often cancer patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) are discharged from the emergency department (ED) or outpatient clinic and whether direct discharge is safe. We assessed treatment setting and early safety outcomes in cancer patients with acute symptomatic and incidental PE. METHODS: Cancer patients diagnosed with PE at the ED or outpatient clinic between August 2017 and May 2021 were included in Four Cities VTE Cancer, a Dutch multicenter retrospective cohort study. The main outcome was direct discharge versus hospitalization. Safety outcomes were cumulative 14-day mortality and PE-related readmission incidences. RESULTS: We included 602 patients (median age 71 years; 49.5 % female) of whom 285 (47.3 %) were discharged directly and 317 (52.7 %) were hospitalized. The cumulative 14-day mortality incidence was 0.7 % (95 % CI, 0.1-2.4 %) in patients discharged directly and 9.0 % (95 % CI, 6.2-12.5 %) in those hospitalized. The cumulative 14-day PE-related readmission incidence was 1.8 % (95 % CI, 0.7-3.9 %) and 1.4 % (95 % CI, 0.5-3.3 %) in directly discharged and hospitalized patients, respectively. Of the 220 patients with incidental PE, 180 (81.8 %) were discharged directly compared to 105 of 382 (27.5 %) patients with symptomatic PE (P < 0.001). Mortality and readmission incidences in symptomatic and incidental PE were consistent with the main analysis. CONCLUSIONS: About 28 % and 82 % of cancer patients with symptomatic or incidental PE, respectively, were discharged directly, with low 14-day mortality and PE-related readmission incidences. These data underline the need for PE risk stratification in oncological populations and suggest that clinicians successfully identify a proportion of patients in whom direct discharge is safe.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guman et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Acute symptomatic and incidental pulmonary embolism in cancer patients (n=602). Direct discharge vs. Hospitalization was evaluated on Cumulative 14-day mortality. Direct discharge of cancer patients with acute pulmonary embolism was associated with a low 14-day mortality incidence of 0.7% compared to 9.0% in hospitalized patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: