Key result
ACS presentation linked to ~30.7-fold higher odds of inducible ischemia vs stable CAD in very low FFR.
Why the study?
The relationship between very low FFR, electrically manifest inducible myocardial ischemia, and subsequent symptomatic benefit remained incompletely understood.
Does acute coronary syndrome presentation independently predict stress-induced ischemic electrocardiographic changes more frequently than stable CAD in patients with severely reduced FFR (≤0.60)?
Observational (n=79)
Single-blind (ECG interpretation blinded to FFR data)
Does acute coronary syndrome presentation independently predict stress-induced ischemic electrocardiographic changes more frequently than stable CAD in patients with severely reduced FFR (≤0.60)?
Odds Ratio: 30.66 (95% CI 1.66–565.07)
Absolute Event Rate: 100% vs 59.6%
p-value: p=0.021
In patients with extremely low FFR (≤0.60), those with ACS uniformly display stress-induced electrocardiographic ischemia and greater post-PCI symptom relief, whereas nearly 40% of stable CAD patients do not manifest objective ischemia, underscoring significant discordance between pressure-derived physiology and clinical ischemic presentation.
May support syndrome-stratified FFR thresholds; leaves open whether ACS patients gain more from PCI at extreme values.
Background: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is widely used to guide percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as a surrogate of inducible myocardial ischemia (IMI). However, the relationship between very low FFR, electrically manifest ischemia, and subsequent symptomatic benefit remains incompletely understood. Methods: We investigated stress-induced ischemic electrocardiographic changes in 79 patients with FFR ≤ 0.60, comparing acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and stable coronary artery disease (CAD), and its association with post-PCI symptom improvement. IMI was defined by ischemic ST-segment changes during adenosine stress testing. Pressure-derived physiologic indices, including the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and resting Pd/Pa, were measured, and angina-related symptoms were assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. Results: < 0.001). Despite similar angiographic severity and mean FFR values, iFR and resting Pd/Pa were significantly lower in ACS. In multivariate analyses, ACS and lower iFR or resting Pd/Pa independently predicted IMI. Although angina symptoms improved overall after PCI, the greatest improvement occurred in patients with ACS or IMI. Conclusions: At extremely low FFR values (≤0.60), substantial discordance exists between pressure-derived physiology and IMI, which is closely related to clinical presentation and symptomatic benefit after PCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kang et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Severe single-vessel coronary artery disease with fractional flow reserve ≤0.60 (n=79). Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) vs. Stable coronary artery disease (CAD) was evaluated on Definite inducible myocardial ischemia (ischemic ST-segment changes during adenosine stress testing) (OR 30.66, 95% CI 1.66-565.07, p=0.021). Acute coronary syndrome was associated with a significantly higher rate of inducible myocardial ischemia compared to stable CAD in patients with extremely low FFR (100% vs 59.6%, OR 30.66).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: