Why the study?
Does focal wall overstretching during coronary stenting increase the restenosis rate in lesions treated with Palmaz-Schatz stents?
Does focal wall overstretching during coronary stenting increase the restenosis rate in lesions treated with Palmaz-Schatz stents?
Focal wall overstretching after high-pressure coronary stent implantation does not appear to increase the rate of restenosis.
Focal overstretching need not be avoided to limit restenosis; leaves open randomized confirmation in contemporary drug-eluting stents.
To determine if vessel wall overstretching during coronary stenting is associated with a higher restenosis rate, the intravascular ultrasound morphological evaluation was performed following ultrasound criteria. A total of 468 lesions with successful coronary Palmaz-Schatz stenting guided by intravascular ultrasound were classified into the no overstretching group (n = 295) and the overstretching group (n = 147). There were 26 lesions not classifiable due to the poststent morphology. Balloon-to-vessel ratio was 1.12 +/- 0.17 in the no focal overstretching group and 1. 20 +/- 0.20 in the overstretching group (P < 0.0002). Follow-up angiogram was performed in 77% of no focal overstretching group and in 75% of the focal overstretching group. The restenosis rate of the no focal overstretching group was 19.8% and 20.9% in the focal overstretching group, respectively (P = 0.65). Focal overstretching was more frequent following balloon oversizing. No increase in restenosis rate, found in focal overstretched stented lesions, leads us to the hypothesis of a regulation of smooth-muscle-cell proliferation activated by the normalization of blood flow and of shear stress, when stent implantation succeeds in optimally improving the lumen. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 48:24-30, 1999.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakamura et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: