Key result
High-intensity training lowers 24-hour systolic BP by ~11 mmHg, outperforming low-moderate intensity exercise.
Why the study?
The study investigated the effect of high versus low-moderate intensity community-based exercise training programs on blood pressure in hypertensive individuals receiving at least one antihypertensive drug.
Does high versus low-moderate intensity exercise training reduce blood pressure in hypertensive individuals receiving antihypertensive medication?
RCT (n=60)
1:1:1 ratio using Epidata software
No
Does high versus low-moderate intensity exercise training reduce blood pressure in hypertensive individuals receiving antihypertensive medication?
Mean Difference: -10.8 (95% CI -15.4–-6.2)
p-value: p=<0.001
High-intensity exercise training significantly reduces ambulatory blood pressure in medically treated hypertensive patients compared to low-moderate intensity, though it is associated with lower adherence.
High-intensity training augments ambulatory BP control in medicated hypertensives; extends mixed evidence on optimal exercise intensity.
Objective: In this pilot clinical study we investigated the effect on blood pressure (BP) of two community-based exercise training programs of high (HIT) vs. low-moderate intensity (LMIT) in hypertensive individuals receiving at least one antihypertensive drug. Methods: The study included two phases of physical exercises based on 1-h session, 3 days/week for 12 and 16 weeks, respectively, separately by a 7-week resting period. Each phase was preceded by a four-week conditioning training period. According to the average maximal heart rate at baseline, participants were randomized to HIT (80–90%), LMIT (50–70%) or no-exercise (control). Heart rate was monitored during workout and BP profiles were registered by ambulatory BP monitoring at the beginning and end of each phase. Results: Of 60 individuals randomized, 44 completed the study (HIT, n = 10; LMIT, n = 16; controls, n = 18). BP levels were significantly reduced after the second phase for both LMIT (SBP −3.1 mmHg, DBP −2.4 mmHg) and HIT (SBP −10.8 mmHg, DBP −8.3 mmHg). Similar levels of improvement were also found in daytime and night-time BP. Mean attendance of the prescribed training sessions was 87.4 ± 6.2% for HIT and 87.4 ± 5.3% for LMIT during the first phase and 84.1 ± 5.0% and 85.2 ± 5.9% during the second phase, respectively (p = 0.047). Conclusion: Both HIT and LMIT exercise training programs reduced BP but the HIT modality showed a lower rate of compliance with proposed training schedule. Intensity of training should be individually prescribed to improve tolerance to more high intensity exercises.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ávila-Gandía et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Hypertension (n=60). High intensity training (HIT) vs. Low-moderate intensity training (LMIT) and no-exercise control was evaluated on Change in 24-hour systolic blood pressure after the second 16-week training phase (MD -10.8 mmHg, 95% CI -15.4 to -6.2, p=<0.001). High intensity training significantly reduced 24-hour systolic blood pressure by 10.8 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure by 8.3 mmHg, whereas low-moderate intensity training did not.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: