How, in a textual system which lacks a concept of authorial/intellectual property, and which operates largely through techniques of imitation, can there be such a thing as "plagiarism"? Can there be such a thing? What is being stolen? By whom? How? And how might it be useful to those of us living at the hypostasization of authorial/intellectual property at the end of the twentieth century to consider its prehistory in the early seventeenth?
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Max Thomas (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: