Key result
Unanesthetized freely moving rats and mice demonstrate a total absence of conventional rate-adaptation for both QT interval and ventricular effective refractory period across various pacing cycle lengths.
Why the study?
Does pacing cycle length affect QT interval and ventricular refractory period in unanesthetized rodents?
Does pacing cycle length affect QT interval and ventricular refractory period in unanesthetized rodents?
Unanesthetized rodents lack conventional rate-adaptation of QT interval and VERP, arguing against the empirical use of QT interval correction methods for heart rate in rodent studies.
Caution against QTc formulas in rodent studies; leaves open translation to other species or humans.
Aim: The cardiac electrophysiology of mice and rats has been analyzed extensively, often in the context of pathological manipulations. However, the effects of beating rate on the basic electrical properties of the rodent heart remain unclear. Due to technical challenges, reported electrophysiological studies in rodents are mainly from ex-vivo preparations or under deep anesthesia, conditions that might be quite far from the normal physiological state. The aim of the current study was to characterize the ventricular rate-adaptation properties of unanesthetized rats and mice. Methods: An implanted device was chronically implanted in rodents for atrial or ventricular pacing studies. Following recovery from surgery, QT interval was evaluated in rodents exposed to atrial pacing at various frequencies. In addition, the frequency dependence of ventricular refractoriness was tested by conventional ventricular programmed stimulation protocols. Results: Our findings indicate total absence of conventional rate-adaptation properties for both QT interval and ventricular refractoriness. Using monophasic action potential recordings in isolated mice hearts we could confirm the previously reported shortening of the action potential duration at fast pacing rates. However, we found that this mild shortening did not result in similar decrease of ventricular refractory period. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that unanesthetized rodents exhibit flat QT interval and ventricular refractory period rate-dependence. This data argue against empirical use of QT interval correction methods in rodent studies. Our new methodology allowing atrial and ventricular pacing of unanesthetized freely moving rodents may facilitate more appropriate utility of these important animal models in the context of cardiac electrophysiology studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mulla et al. (2018) studied Healthy (n=43). Atrial and ventricular pacing at various cycle lengths vs. Baseline sinus rhythm / different cycle lengths was evaluated on QT interval and ventricular effective refractory period (VERP) changes across different pacing cycle lengths. Unanesthetized freely moving rats and mice demonstrate a total absence of conventional rate-adaptation for both QT interval and ventricular effective refractory period across various pacing cycle lengths.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: