Key result
His bundle ATP shows similar VT termination to RV ATP but reduces VT acceleration.
Why the study?
ATP delivered to the RV is not effective against all VT episodes and can cause VT acceleration or degeneration into VF, motivating strategies to improve ATP.
Does His bundle ATP improve safety and efficacy compared to conventional RV ATP in a canine model of myocardial ischemic injury?
Does His bundle ATP improve safety and efficacy compared to conventional RV ATP in a canine model of myocardial ischemic injury?
In a canine ischemic injury model, His bundle ATP was safer than conventional RV ATP, significantly reducing the risk of VT acceleration and degeneration into VF while maintaining similar efficacy.
His bundle ATP appears safer than RV ATP in canine ischemia; leaves open clinical translation pending human trials.
INTRODUCTION: Antitachycardia pacing (ATP) is used to terminate ventricular tachycardia (VT) by delivering rapid, low energy pacing to the right ventricle (RV). Unfortunately, ATP is not effective against all VT episodes and can result in adverse outcomes, such as VT acceleration and degeneration into ventricular fibrillation (VF). Improving ATP is therefore desirable. Our objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of ATP delivered at the His bundle to traditional ATP. METHODS: Six dogs were anesthetized and pacing leads were implanted in the RV and His bundle. The left anterior descending artery was occluded for 2 h to create an ischemic injury. In a study 4-7 days later, a 128-electrode sock was placed snugly around the ventricles and VT was induced using rapid pacing. ATP was delivered from either the His bundle or RV lead, then attempted at the other location if unsuccessful. Success rates and instances of VT acceleration and degeneration into VF were calculated. RESULTS: We induced 83 runs of VT and attempted ATP 128 times. RV ATP was successful in 36% of attempts; His ATP was successful in 38% of attempts. RV ATP resulted in significantly more adverse outcomes. RV and His ATP induced VT acceleration in 9% and 3% of trains, respectively, and induced degeneration into VF in 5% and 1% of trains, respectively. CONCLUSION: His bundle ATP is safer, but not significantly more effective, than RV ATP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hirahara et al. (2023) studied Ventricular Tachycardia (n=6). Antitachycardia pacing (ATP) at the His bundle vs. Antitachycardia pacing (ATP) at the right ventricle (RV) was evaluated on Ventricular tachycardia termination success rate (p=not significant). His bundle antitachycardia pacing was not significantly more effective than right ventricular pacing (38% vs 36% success) but resulted in significantly fewer adverse outcomes such as VT acceleration (3% vs 9%) and degeneration into ventricular fibrillation (1% vs 5%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: