Key result
Vagal nerve stimulation reduced ventricular tachyarrhythmia inducibility from 75% to 40% during sympathoexcitation in chronically infarcted porcine hearts.
Why the study?
It was unclear whether vagal nerve stimulation can overcome the electrophysiological effects of sympathoexcitation in the setting of chronic myocardial infarction.
Does intermittent vagal nerve stimulation reduce electrical heterogeneities and arrhythmia inducibility during sympathoexcitation in chronically infarcted porcine hearts?
Does intermittent vagal nerve stimulation reduce electrical heterogeneities and arrhythmia inducibility during sympathoexcitation in chronically infarcted porcine hearts?
Absolute Event Rate: 40% vs 75%
p-value: p=<0.05
Vagal nerve stimulation mitigates the pro-arrhythmic electrophysiological effects of sympathetic activation and reduces VT inducibility in a chronic myocardial infarction model.
May attenuate sympathetic proarrhythmia post-MI; extends preclinical data but leaves clinical translation open.
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to evaluate whether intermittent VNS reduces electrical heterogeneities and arrhythmia inducibility during sympathoexcitation. BACKGROUND: Sympathoexcitation increases the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VT). Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) has been antiarrhythmic in the setting of ischemia-driven arrhythmias, but it is unclear if it can overcome the electrophysiological effects of sympathoexcitation in the setting of chronic myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS: In Yorkshire pigs after chronic MI, a sternotomy was performed, a 56-electrode sock was placed over the ventricles (n = 17), and a basket catheter was positioned in the left ventricle (n = 6). Continuous unipolar electrograms from sock and basket arrays were obtained to analyze activation recovery interval (ARI), a surrogate of action potential duration. Bipolar voltage mapping was performed to define scar, border zone, or viable myocardium. Hemodynamic and electrical parameters and VT inducibility were evaluated during sympathoexcitation with bilateral stellate ganglia stimulation (BSS) and during combined BSS with intermittent VNS. RESULTS: ]). VNS reduced VT inducibility during sympathoexcitation (from 75%-40%; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: After chronic MI, VNS overcomes the detrimental effects of sympathoexcitation by reducing electrophysiological heterogeneities exacerbated by sympathetic stimulation, decreasing VT inducibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoang et al. (2022) studied Chronic myocardial infarction (n=17). Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) vs. Bilateral stellate ganglia stimulation (BSS) alone was evaluated on Ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT) inducibility (p=<0.05). Vagal nerve stimulation reduced ventricular tachyarrhythmia inducibility from 75% to 40% during sympathoexcitation in chronically infarcted porcine hearts.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: