Key result
Electrical storm was independently associated with a significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR 3.14) in patients with structural heart disease and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.
Why the study?
Electrical storm is associated with an increased mortality risk, but detailed information regarding its incidence, determinants, and impact on mortality has been lacking.
Does electrical storm increase mortality in patients with structural heart disease and preserved or moderately reduced left ventricular function?
Observational (n=1,256)
Yes
Does electrical storm increase mortality in patients with structural heart disease and preserved or moderately reduced left ventricular function?
Effect estimate: HR 3.14 (95% CI 1.83-5.40)
Absolute Event Rate: 20% vs 10.1%
p-value: p=<0.001
Electrical storm is an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality in patients with structural heart disease, including those with preserved or moderately reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.
Electrical storm marks higher mortality risk across EF strata; extends registry observations but leaves causal impact and interventions open.
Electrical storm (ES), defined by 3 or more occurrences of ventricular arrhythmias within 24 hours, has been shown to be associated with an increased risk of mortality; however, detailed information remains lacking. We aimed to examine the incidence and determinants of ES and its impact on mortality in patients enrolled in the nationwide implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) registry.We studied 1,256 patients (age 65 ± 12 years) who had structural heart disease with an ICD. The patients were classified into reduced ejection fraction (EF < 35%; 657 (52%) patients) and preserved or moderately reduced EF (EF ≥ 35%; 599 (48%) patients).ES occurred in 49 (7%) and 36 (6%) patients in the EF < 35% and EF ≥ 35% groups (log-rank P = 0.297) during the median follow-up of 2.3 years. ICD with resynchronization therapy was associated with a lower incidence of ES in patients with EF < 35%. Non-ischemic heart disease and diuretics were associated with ES in patients with EF ≥ 35%. During the follow-up, 10/49 (20%) patients with ES and 80/608 patients (13%) without ES died in patients with EF < 35%, while 7/36 (19%) patients with ES and 38/563 patients (7%) without ES died in those with EF ≥ 35%. We have created 4 Cox multivariate models. All models showed approximately 2-fold higher hazard ratios in patients with EF ≥ 35% compared to EF < 35%.Our study showed that the determinants of ES differed between EF < 35% and EF ≥ 35%. The impact of ES for mortality was numerically higher in EF ≥ 35% than in EF < 35%, although a significant interaction was not detected.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watanabe et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Structural heart disease with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (n=1,256). Electrical storm vs. No electrical storm was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 3.14, 95% CI 1.83-5.40, p=<0.001). Electrical storm was independently associated with a significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR 3.14) in patients with structural heart disease and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: