Key result
Spinal cord stimulation reduced the number of responsive sites inducing tachyarrhythmia by 60% and bradycardia by 25% in dogs, an effect dependent on intact stellate ganglia.
Why the study?
Does spinal cord stimulation suppress bradycardias and atrial tachyarrhythmias induced by mediastinal nerve stimulation in dogs?
Does spinal cord stimulation suppress bradycardias and atrial tachyarrhythmias induced by mediastinal nerve stimulation in dogs?
Spinal cord stimulation suppresses the induction of atrial arrhythmias resulting from excessive activation of intrinsic cardiac neurons, an effect dependent on intact stellate ganglia.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Spinal cord stimulation effects remain preclinical in dogs; hypothesis-generating for neuromodulation in human atrial arrhythmias, pending clinical trials.
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) applied to the dorsal aspect of the cranial thoracic cord imparts cardioprotection under conditions of neuronally dependent cardiac stress. This study investigated whether neuronally induced atrial arrhythmias can be modulated by SCS. In 16 anesthetized dogs with intact stellate ganglia and in five with bilateral stellectomy, trains of five electrical stimuli were delivered during the atrial refractory period to right- or left-sided mediastinal nerves for up to 20 s before and after SCS (20 min). Recordings were obtained from 191 biatrial epicardial sites. Before SCS (11 animals), mediastinal nerve stimulation initiated bradycardia alone (12 nerve sites), bradycardia followed by tachyarrhythmia/fibrillation (50 sites), as well as tachyarrhythmia/fibrillation without a preceding bradycardia (21 sites). After SCS, the number of responsive sites inducing bradycardia was reduced by 25% (62 to 47 sites), and the cycle length prolongation in residual bradycardias was reduced. The number of responsive sites inducing tachyarrhythmia was reduced by 60% (71 to 29 sites). Once elicited, residual tachyarrhythmias arose from similar epicardial foci, displaying similar dynamics (cycle length) as in control states. In the absence of SCS, bradycardias and tachyarrhythmias induced by repeat nerve stimulation were reproducible (five additional animals). After bilateral stellectomy, SCS no longer influenced neuronal induction of bradycardia and atrial tachyarrhythmias. These data indicate that SCS obtunds the induction of atrial arrhythmias resulting from excessive activation of intrinsic cardiac neurons and that such protective effects depend on the integrity of nerves coursing via the subclavian ansae and stellate ganglia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cardinal et al. (2006) studied Neuronally induced atrial arrhythmias and bradycardia (n=21). Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) vs. Before SCS (baseline) and absence of SCS was evaluated on Induction of bradycardia and atrial tachyarrhythmias by mediastinal nerve stimulation. Spinal cord stimulation reduced the number of responsive sites inducing tachyarrhythmia by 60% and bradycardia by 25% in dogs, an effect dependent on intact stellate ganglia.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: