Key result
Spinal cord stimulation (90% threshold voltage) facilitated the effect of vagus nerve stimulation and attenuated the effect of stellate ganglion stimulation on atrial electrophysiology in 14 dogs.
RCT (n=14)
Randomly divided
No immediate clinical implications; leaves open whether spinal cord stimulation modulates autonomic effects on human atrial electrophysiology.
Objective To investigate the effect of the mutual regulation of the extrinsic cardiac nerves on atrial electrophysiology and atrial fibrillation (AF) vulnerability. Methods and results Fourteen dogs were randomly divided into two groups: spinal cord stimulation (SCS) group (n = 7) and spinal cord block (SCB) group (n = 7). SCS was performed with 90% of the threshold voltage stimulating the T 1 –T 2 spinal level, while SCB was performed by injecting 2% lidocaine into the epidural space at the T 2–3 level. The effective refractory period (ERP), ERP dispersion, and AF inducibility were measured during atrial pacing combined with different extrinsic cardiac nerve stimulation. ERPs were decreased in the atrium and pulmonary veins and ERP dispersion was increased from baseline during left cervical vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) or left stellate ganglion stimulation (SGS) in the two groups. When combined with SCS, VNS resulted in diminished ERPs at all recording sites, longer ERP dispersion and more episodes of AF than were observed during VNS, whereas ERPs were greater and correspondingly fewer episodes of AF occurred during SCS combined with SGS than SGS. In the SCB group, ERPs were shortened, ERP dispersion was lengthened, and episodes of AF were increased during SGS after SCB. SCS enhanced the activity of the left vagus nerve but attenuated the left stellate ganglion and superior left ganglionated plexus. Conclusion SCS modulates extrinsic and intrinsic cardiac nerve activity among the vagus nerve, stellate ganglion, and ganglionated plexus. SCS facilitates the effect of VNS and attenuates the effect of SGS on atrial electrophysiology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dai et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in Atrial fibrillation (n=14). Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) vs. Spinal cord block (SCB) with 2% lidocaine was evaluated on Effective refractory period (ERP), ERP dispersion, and AF inducibility. Spinal cord stimulation (90% threshold voltage) facilitated the effect of vagus nerve stimulation and attenuated the effect of stellate ganglion stimulation on atrial electrophysiology in 14 dogs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: