Key result
This document provides editorial board information and contains no clinical study data regarding anticoagulant therapy for venous thromboembolism.
Why the study?
What is the optimal duration of anticoagulation after an episode of venous thromboembolism?
What is the optimal duration of anticoagulation after an episode of venous thromboembolism?
This review synthesizes data on risk factors for VTE recurrence and bleeding to help clinicians individualize the duration of extended anticoagulant therapy.
Offers no guidance on post-VTE anticoagulation duration; leaves open questions on individualizing therapy based on recurrence and bleeding risks.
Recent trials on secondary prophylaxis after venous thromboembolism (VTE) have provided a wealth of data on the risk factors for recurrence and, to some extent, also for bleeding. Some of the results are consistent across the studies, but there are also conflicting data. Certain risk factors, such as pulmonary embolism versus deep vein thrombosis or presence of cardiolipin antibodies, have a more pronounced influence on the risk early in the course of disease. Others, such as hereditary thrombophilic defects, seem to gain importance over many years of follow-up. Therefore, it can be difficult to make decisions on an individual patient basis. In this article, data from important and illustrative trials have been extracted and compared and controversies highlighted. The conclusions drawn should help clinicians make balanced decisions on the optimal duration of anticoagulation after an episode of VTE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ögren et al. (2006) conducted an editorial in venous thromboembolism. anticoagulant therapy was evaluated. This document provides editorial board information and contains no clinical study data regarding anticoagulant therapy for venous thromboembolism.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: