Why the study?
What is the optimal duration of secondary prophylaxis (extension of anticoagulation) after venous thromboembolism?
What is the optimal duration of secondary prophylaxis (extension of anticoagulation) after venous thromboembolism?
The decision to extend anticoagulation after VTE requires individualized assessment of evolving risk factors for both recurrence and bleeding.
Requires ongoing risk reassessment for post-VTE anticoagulation; leaves open prospective validation of dynamic models.
Whereas every clinician agrees on the need for anticoagulation initially after the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism (VTE), the opinions regarding optimal duration of secondary prophylaxis differ. The decision is complicated by the large number of identified risk factors associated with the risk of recurrence. In addition consideration has to be taken to the risk factors for bleeding and individual patient preferences. Data from long-term follow-up studies up to a decade indicate that some risk factors for recurrence decline and others seem to gain importance with time. In this review data has been extracted from the most illustrative trials to highlight controversies but also where there is consensus in order to give the clinician some support for the individual decisions on extension of anticoagulation after VTE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sam Schulman (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: