Key result
Posterior body surface sites showed a higher correlation with intracardiac left atrial dominant frequency compared to anterior sites.
Why the study?
Does posterior body surface potential mapping improve non-invasive estimation of left atrial dominant frequency in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to anterior mapping?
Observational (n=20)
No
Does posterior body surface potential mapping improve non-invasive estimation of left atrial dominant frequency in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to anterior mapping?
Posterior body surface sites provide a significantly more accurate non-invasive estimation of left atrial dominant fibrillation frequency than anterior sites in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Posterior mapping may refine non-invasive AF frequency estimates; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
The dominant driving sources of atrial fibrillation are often found in the left atrium, but the expression of left atrial activation on the body surface is poorly understood. Using body surface potential mapping and simultaneous invasive measurements of left atrial activation our aim was to describe the expression of the left atrial dominant fibrillation frequency across the body surface. 20 patients in atrial fibrillation were studied. The spatial distributions of the dominant atrial fibrillation frequency across anterior and posterior sites on the body surface were quantified. Their relationship with invasive left atrial dominant fibrillation frequency was assessed by linear regression analysis, and the coefficient of determination was calculated for each body surface site. The correlation between intracardiac and body surface dominant frequency was significantly higher with posterior compared with anterior sites (coefficient of determination 67±8% vs 48±2%, p<0.001). The site with largest coefficient of determination was 79.6% (p<0.001) and was a posterior site. In comparison with the site closest to lead V1 it had a coefficient of determination of 23.0% (p=0.033), and with the posterior body surface site closest to lead V9 had a coefficient of determination of 70.3% (p<0.001). Left atrial dominant fibrillation frequency was more closely represented at posterior body surface sites.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bojarnejad et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Atrial Fibrillation (n=20). Posterior body surface potential mapping sites vs. Anterior body surface potential mapping sites was evaluated on Coefficient of determination (R2) between intracardiac and body surface dominant frequency (p=<0.001). Posterior body surface sites showed a higher correlation with intracardiac left atrial dominant frequency compared to anterior sites.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: