Key result
Coronary sinus access guided by phlebography in multiple projections was successful in 94.9% of CRT implantation procedures, with the 30° RAO view proving useful for identifying difficult anatomies.
Why the study?
CRT remains challenging to deploy widely due to difficult or unsuccessful coronary sinus access in up to 10% to 15% of patients.
Does coronary sinus phlebography using AP, LAO, and RAO projections improve the identification of demanding cases and facilitate successful CS catheterization and LV lead positioning in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy undergoing CRT?
Observational (n=38)
No
Does coronary sinus phlebography using AP, LAO, and RAO projections improve the identification of demanding cases and facilitate successful CS catheterization and LV lead positioning in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy undergoing CRT?
The use of the 30° RAO projection during coronary sinus phlebography helps identify altered spatial orientation of the CS ostium, facilitating successful LV lead positioning in demanding CRT cases.
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves symptoms and reduces morbidity and mortality in select heart failure patients but remains challenging to deploy widely because of difficult or unsuccessful coronary sinus (CS) access in up to 10% to 15% of patients. This report describes the radiological and anatomical aspects for improving CS catheterization and left ventricular (LV) lead positioning, focusing on the radioscopic and anatomical aspects, based on phlebography, to identify demanding cases in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy referred for CRT implantation. Anatomical and radiological aspects were explored in the anteroposterior, 30° left anterior oblique, and 30° right anterior oblique (RAO) views. In total, 117 phlebographies were performed in 39 consecutive procedures (one reintervention). Access to the CS was successful 37 times (94.9%). The most difficult cases were complicated by issues related to the altered spatial orientation of the CS ostium toward the tricuspid annular plane (TAP), which was best perceived in the 30° RAO projection and occurred in 37% of patients. One of two catheterization failures that occurred was caused by anomalous coronary venous drainage into the left atrium. Final LV lead positioning was successful in 36 (92.3%) of 39 procedures. More severe heart failure and worse LV ejection fraction did not translate into greater difficulty in LV lead implantation. As such, understanding anatomical and radiological relationships is the key to successful LV lead positioning. RAO projection can be particularly useful in the assessment of demanding CRT implant cases, especially when the CS ostium pointed to the TAP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Dilated cardiomyopathy with heart failure (n=38). Coronary sinus phlebography in AP, 30° LAO, and 30° RAO projections was evaluated on Stable coronary sinus catheterization success rate. Coronary sinus access guided by phlebography in multiple projections was successful in 94.9% of CRT implantation procedures, with the 30° RAO view proving useful for identifying difficult anatomies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: