Key result
Geographic regions with the highest PCI utilization rates had a significantly lower proportion of appropriate PCIs (72.8%) compared to regions with the lowest utilization rates (76.5%).
Why the study?
Does higher regional PCI utilization correlate with higher rates of inappropriate or unmappable PCI procedures in patients undergoing PCI?
Observational (n=380,981)
Yes
Does higher regional PCI utilization correlate with higher rates of inappropriate or unmappable PCI procedures in patients undergoing PCI?
Absolute Event Rate: 72.768% vs 76.53%
p-value: p=<0.001
Geographic regions with higher PCI utilization rates perform a lower proportion of appropriate PCIs and more unmappable elective PCIs, though risk-adjusted mortality remains similar across regions.
Higher regional PCI utilization may signal lower appropriateness thresholds; hypothesis-generating for optimizing regional benchmarks.
BACKGROUND: Substantial geographic variation exists in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) use across the United States. It is unclear the extent to which high PCI utilization can be explained by PCI for inappropriate indications. The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between PCI rates across regional healthcare markets utilizing hospital referral regions (HRRs) and PCI appropriateness. METHODS: The number of PCI procedures in each HRR was obtained from the 2010 100% Medicare limited data set. HRRs were divided into quintiles of PCI utilization with increasing rates of utilization progressing to quintile 5. NCDR CathPCI Registry® data were used to evaluate patient characteristics, appropriate use criteria (AUC), and outcomes across the HRR quintiles defined by PCI utilization with the study population restricted to HRRs where ≥ 80% of the PCIs were performed at institutions participating in the registry. PCI appropriateness was defined using 2012 AUC by the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA)/The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI). RESULTS: Our study cohort comprised of 380,981 patients treated at 178 HRRs. Mean PCI rates per 1,000 increased from 4.6 in Quintile 1 to 10.8 in Quintile 5. The proportion of non-acute PCIs was 27.7% in Quintile 1 increasing to 30.7% in Quintile 5. Significant variation (p < 0.001) existed across the quintiles in the categorization of appropriateness across HRRs of utilization with more appropriate PCI in lower utilization areas (Appropriate: Q1, 76.53%, Q2, 75.326%, Q3, 75.23%, Q4, 73.95%, Q5, 72.768%; Inappropriate: Q1 3.92%, Q2 4.23%, Q3 4.32%, Q4 4.35%, Q5 4.05%; Uncertain: Q1 8.29%, Q2 8.84%, Q3 8.08%, Q4 9.01%, Q5 8.93%; Not Mappable: Q1 11.26%, Q2 11.67%, Q3 12.37%, Q4 12.69%, Q5 14.34%). There was no difference in risk-adjusted mortality across quintiles of PCI utilization. CONCLUSIONS: Geographic regions with lower PCI rates have a higher proportion of PCIs performed for appropriate indications. Areas that perform more PCIs also appear to perform more elective PCI and many could not be mapped by the AUC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (n=380,981). High PCI utilization regions (Quintile 5) vs. Low PCI utilization regions (Quintile 1) was evaluated on Proportion of PCIs classified as appropriate (p=<0.001). Geographic regions with the highest PCI utilization rates had a significantly lower proportion of appropriate PCIs (72.8%) compared to regions with the lowest utilization rates (76.5%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: