Key result
HFpEF therapies fail to improve prognosis despite promising biomarker and hemodynamic gains.
Why the study?
Do pharmacological treatments improve clinical outcomes, biomarkers, or functional capacity in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction?
Do pharmacological treatments improve clinical outcomes, biomarkers, or functional capacity in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction?
This review highlights that while HFpEF accounts for over 50% of heart failure cases, large outcome trials have failed to show prognostic benefit, though novel agents show promise in Phase II trials.
No prognostic benefit yet in HFpEF; leaves open whether phase II signals will translate in larger trials.
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a major and growing public health problem. Epidemiologic studies demonstrated that heart failure (HF) can be clinically diagnosed in patients with normal or preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. These patients are therefore termed as having HFpEF. In the past, this was often called diastolic HF. Because of the permanent increase of the prevalence of HFpEF during the past decades, HFpEF now accounts for more than 50% of the total HF population. There are uncertainties and debates regarding the definition, diagnosis, and pathophysiology with the consequence that all outcome trials performed so far used criteria for inclusion and exclusion that were not consistent. These trials also failed to document improved prognosis. Recent smaller proof-of-concept or Phase II clinical trials investigating different pathophysiological approaches with substances such as the neprilysin inhibitor-angiotensin receptor blocker- combination (LCZ 696), ranolazine, or ivabradine were successful to improve biomarkers, haemodynamics, or functional capacity. Future trials will need to document whether also prognosis can be improved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frank Edelmann (2015) conducted a review in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Pharmacological treatments was evaluated. Outcome trials for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction have so far failed to document improved prognosis, though smaller phase II trials show promise in improving biomarkers and hemodynamics.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: