Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The GW approximation represents the state-of-the-art ab-initio method for computing excited-state properties. Its execution requires control over a larger number of parameters, and therefore, its application in high-throughput studies is hindered by the complex and time-consuming convergence process across a multidimensional parameter space. To address these challenges, we develop a fully-automated open-source workflow for G0W0 calculations within the AiiDA framework and the projector augmented wave (PAW) method. The workflow is based on an efficient estimation of the errors in the quasi-particle (QP) energies due to basis-set truncation and ultra-soft PAW potentials norm violation, which allows a reduction in the dimensionality of the parameter space and avoids the need for multidimensional convergence searches. Protocol validation is conducted through a systematic comparison against established experimental and state-of-the-art GW data. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach, we construct a database of QP energies for a dataset of over 320 bulk structures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Varrassi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: