Why the study?
Does non-Newtonian blood flow modeling alter the spatial and temporal distribution of wall shear stress in a human left coronary artery bifurcation compared to Newtonian modeling?
Population
Computational model of a normal human left coronary artery bifurcation
Comparison
Pulsatile non-Newtonian flow modeling vs Newtonian flow modeling
Design
Preclinical
Authors
Loading...
Low wall shear stress patterns at coronary bifurcation lateral walls are robust to viscosity assumptions; leaves open whether this refines atherosclerosis risk prediction in patients.
Does non-Newtonian blood flow modeling alter the spatial and temporal distribution of wall shear stress in a human left coronary artery bifurcation compared to Newtonian modeling?
Computational modeling demonstrates that low and oscillating wall shear stress at the lateral walls of coronary bifurcations during systole predisposes to atherosclerosis, a finding independent of whether Newtonian or non-Newtonian blood properties are assumed.
Soulis et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: