Why the study?
Do traditional risk factors (systolic blood pressure, total serum cholesterol, and smoking status) predict the short-term and long-term risk of coronary heart disease and stroke differently in middle-aged men?
Do traditional risk factors (systolic blood pressure, total serum cholesterol, and smoking status) predict the short-term and long-term risk of coronary heart disease and stroke differently in middle-aged men?
Traditional cardiovascular risk factors effectively predict the long-term cumulative risk of coronary heart disease but are less predictive for stroke in middle-aged men.
Supports traditional factors for long-term CHD risk counseling but not stroke; leaves open refined stroke prediction models.
AIMS: The aim of this study was to examine the short-term and long-term cumulative risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke separately based on age, sex, smoking status, systolic blood pressure, and total serum cholesterol. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Primary Prevention Study comprising 7174 men aged between 47 and 55 free from a previous history of CHD, stroke, and diabetes at baseline examination (1970-73) was followed up for 35 years. To estimate the cumulative effect of CHD and stroke, all participants were stratified into one of five risk groups, defined by their number of risk factors. The estimated 10-year risk for high-risk individuals when adjusted for age and competing risk was 18.1% for CHD and 3.2% for stroke which increased to 47.8 and 19.6%, respectively, after 35 years. The estimates based on risk factors performed well throughout the period for CHD but less well for stroke. CONCLUSION: The prediction of traditional risk factors (systolic blood pressure, total serum cholesterol, and smoking status) on short-term risk (0-10 years) and long-term risk (0-35 years) of CHD of stroke differs substantially. This indicates that the cumulative risk in middle-aged men based on these traditional risk factors can effectively be used to predict CHD but not stroke to the same extent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giang et al. (2013) studied this question.