Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the clinical effects and long-term outcomes of catheter-based renal denervation in patients with cardiovascular disease and diabetes.
Does catheter-based renal denervation improve glycemic levels in patients with uncontrolled hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and coronary artery disease?
Does catheter-based renal denervation improve glycemic levels in patients with uncontrolled hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and coronary artery disease?
Catheter-based renal denervation significantly improves carbohydrate metabolism and blood pressure in patients with comorbid uncontrolled hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and coronary artery disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support glycemic and BP improvements with renal denervation in comorbid patients; leaves open pleiotropic effects pending randomized trials.
Aim. To study the clinical effects and long-term outcomes of catheterbased renal denervation (CRD) in patients with cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Material and methods. This single-center prospective observational study included 60 patients with uncontrolled hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and coronary artery disease after complete endovascular revascularization. Patients were divided into 30 groups into the CRD group and the control group. CRD was performed via femoral access using a Spyral catheter (Medtronic, USA). The primary endpoint was the change in glycemic levels after 12 months. Results. In the CRD group, a significant decrease in basal glycemia level from 9,3 (7,67-10,12) to 6,05 (5,2-8,3) mmol/l, glycated hemoglobin from 7,6 (6,98,4) to 6,6 (6,2-7,2)%, Homeostasis Model Assessment Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) from 6,6 (3,73-11,2) to 4,76 (2,73-7,1) — in the absence of significant changes in the control group. A significant decrease in the average level of office systolic (-14 (-24; -10) mm Hg, p=0,0002) and diastolic blood pressure (-10 (-10; -6) mm Hg, p=0,0002), p=0,0007) was also revealed — in the absence of significant changes in the control group. There were no significant differences in late lumen loss between the groups: 21,8% (17,3-28,8) in the CRD group vs 26,3% (19,5-34,0) in the control group (p=0,09). Conclusion. A positive effect of CRD on carbohydrate metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes, hypertension and coronary artery disease was revealed. The hypothesis of the pleiotropic effects of CRD was confirmed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arablinsky et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: