Evaluates a risk score for predicting recurrence-free survival in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, indicating potential clinical utility.
Objective: To develop and validate a preoperative risk score incorporating carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9, CT, and fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose ( 18 F-FDG) PET/CT variables to predict recurrence-free survival (RFS) after upfront surgery in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).Materials and Methods: Patients with resectable PDAC who underwent upfront surgery between 2014 and 2017 (development set) or between 2018 and 2019 (test set) were retrospectively evaluated.In the development set, a risk-scoring system was developed using the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, including variables associated with RFS.In the test set, the performance of the risk score was evaluated using the Harrell C-index and compared with that of the postoperative pathological tumor stage.Results: A total of 529 patients, including 335 (198 male; mean age standard deviation, 64 9 years) and 194 (103 male; mean age, 66 9 years) patients in the development and test sets, respectively, were evaluated.The risk score included five variables predicting RFS: tumor size (hazard ratio [HR], 1.29 per 1 cm increment; P < 0.001), maximal standardized uptake values of tumor 5.2 (HR, 1.29; P = 0.06), suspicious regional lymph nodes (HR, 1.43; P = 0.02), possible distant metastasis on 18 F-FDG PET/CT (HR, 2.32; P = 0.03), and CA 19-9 (HR, 1.02 per 100 U/mL increment; P = 0.002).In the test set, the risk score showed good performance in predicting RFS (C-index, 0.61), similar to that of the pathologic tumor stage (C-index, 0.64; P = 0.17). Conclusion:The proposed risk score based on preoperative CA 19-9, CT, and 18 F-FDG PET/CT variables may have clinical utility in selecting high-risk patients with resectable PDAC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeong et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: