Key result
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation significantly reduced the risk of rehospitalization (RR 0.52) and improved functional capacity in patients with HFpEF, but did not reduce all-cause mortality.
Why the study?
Pharmacological options remain limited for HFpEF, and the effects of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation on clinical and functional outcomes in this population remain incompletely defined.
Does exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation reduce rehospitalization and mortality in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction?
Meta-Analysis (n=2,025)
Does exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation reduce rehospitalization and mortality in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction?
Effect estimate: RR 0.52 (95% CI 0.38-0.72)
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in patients with HFpEF significantly reduces the risk of rehospitalization and improves functional capacity and quality of life, though it does not improve all-cause mortality.
Supports incorporating exercise-based CR to reduce rehospitalization in HFpEF; extends prior functional data with pooled RCT evidence on clinical outcomes.
Introduction Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is associated with substantial functional limitation and recurrent hospitalization, while effective pharmacological options remain limited. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) has been proposed as a non-pharmacological strategy; however, its effects on clinical and functional outcomes in HFpEF remain incompletely defined.This meta-analysis aimed to systematically assess the impact of exercise-based CR on rehospitalization, mortality, functional capacity, quality of life, and cardiac function in patients with HFpEF. Methods A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, with electronic database searches performed through December 2024.Nineteen randomized controlled trials involving 2,025 participants were included. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4, with effect estimates expressed as risk ratios (RR) or mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Exercise-based CR did not significantly reduce all-cause mortality (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.77–1.66), but was associated with a significantly lower risk of rehospitalization (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.38–0.72). Significant improvements were observed in functional exercise capacity, including 6-minute walk distance (MD 36.89m) and peak oxygen uptake (VO₂peak; MD 2.14mL/kg/min), as well as physical functioning assessed by the SF-36. Exercise-based CR was also associated with a modest reduction in left atrial volume index, whereas left ventricular ejection fraction remained unchanged. In addition, peak heart rate significantly improved (MD 7.74 bpm, 95% CI 3.68–11.80). Data on blood pressure, lipid profile, glycemic control, and cardiovascular mortality were limited or inconsistently reported, precluding meta-analysis. Conclusion Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation improves functional capacity,cardiorespiratory fitness,and physical quality of life in patients with HFpEF and reduces rehospitalization risk, although no mortality benefit was observed. Systematic Review Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=1069784 , PROSPERO CRD420251069784.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n=2,025). Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation vs. Routine treatment or placebo was evaluated on Rehospitalization (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.38-0.72). Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation significantly reduced the risk of rehospitalization (RR 0.52) and improved functional capacity in patients with HFpEF, but did not reduce all-cause mortality.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: