Why the study?
Mitral annulus disjunction carries a strong association with malignant ventricular arrhythmogenesis and sudden cardiac death, making thorough investigation vital for risk assessment, stratification, and optimal management.
Severe mitral annulus disjunction can present as aborted sudden cardiac death, highlighting the need for multimodality imaging in diagnosis and risk stratification, and often necessitating ICD implantation for secondary prevention.
May support secondary ICDs after aborted SCD in severe MAD; case reports leave open risk stratification and primary prevention needs.
Mitral annulus disjunction (MAD) is defined as a systolic displacement between the ventricular myocardium and the posterior mitral annulus supporting the posterior mitral leaflet. This structural abnormality is associated with the loss of mechanical annular function manifested as an abnormal systolic excursion of the leaflet hinge point into the left atrium but with maintained electrical function, separating the left atrium and ventricle electrophysiologically. The mitro-aortic fibrous continuity limits MAD anteriorly, between the aortic cusps and the anterior leaflet of the mitral valve. Consequently, MAD has been observed only at the insertion of the posterior leaflet. It can extend preferentially at the central posterior scallop. The first diagnostic modality aiding the diagnosis is transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), although in some cases adjunctive cardiac imaging modality might be suggested. MAD carries a strong association with malignant ventricular arrhythmogenesis and a profound predisposition for sudden cardiac death (SCD). In this context, a thorough investigation of this morphological and functional abnormality is vital in estimating the risk assessment and stratification for optimal management and elimination of the risk of the patient for SCD. Based on the current scientific data and literature, we will discuss the diagnosis, clinical implications, risk stratification, and therapeutic management of MAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Apostolou et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: