Why the study?
Does a novel NT-proBNP point-of-care test perform equally to an established BNP point-of-care test in detecting left ventricular dysfunction and heart failure severity?
Does a novel NT-proBNP point-of-care test perform equally to an established BNP point-of-care test in detecting left ventricular dysfunction and heart failure severity?
The novel NT-proBNP point-of-care test performs equally well as the established BNP test for detecting left ventricular dysfunction and heart failure severity.
NT-proBNP may be interchangeable with BNP for LV dysfunction detection; cross-sectional data leave prospective POC validation open.
BACKGROUND: Recently, a novel point-of-care test (POCT) for N-terminal proBNP (NTproBNP) has been introduced (Cardiac proBNP®, Roche). AIM: The aim was to compare the novel POCT for NTproBNP with the established POCT for BNP. METHODS: NTproBNP and BNP were assessed in 222 individuals with chronic heart failure (n = 151) or controls (n = 71) with both POCTs. RESULTS: NTproBNP and BNP were closely correlated upon regression analysis (r = 0.93; p < 0.01). NTproBNP and BNP were both correlated with ejection fraction and New York Heart Association stage. Receiver operating characteristic analysis yielded satisfying and equivalent predictive values for the detection of left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction <40%; NTproBNP: area under the curve 0.97; BNP: area under the curve 0.96; p > 0.05) and presence of New York Heart Association stage >2 (area under the curve 0.92 vs 0.91 for NT-proBNP and BNP, respectively; p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The NTproBNP POCT allows biochemical detection of heart failure with satisfactory predictive values, is equivalent to the BNP POCT and will improve near-patient testing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jungbauer et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: