Key result
Capillary BNP testing very closely correlated with whole blood venous BNP (r = 0.99, p < 0.001) and demonstrated similar diagnostic performance for acute heart failure.
Why the study?
Capillary BNP testing is attractive in outpatient and emergency settings, prompting an evaluation of its clinical performance compared with venous point-of-care BNP and central laboratory NT-proBNP.
Does capillary BNP testing provide comparable diagnostic and prognostic performance to venous whole blood/plasma BNP and NT-proBNP in cardiology patients?
Observational (n=269)
No
Does capillary BNP testing provide comparable diagnostic and prognostic performance to venous whole blood/plasma BNP and NT-proBNP in cardiology patients?
Effect estimate: r = 0.99
p-value: p=<0.001
Capillary BNP testing offers comparable diagnostic and prognostic performance to venous BNP and NT-proBNP, supporting its potential use in outpatient and emergency settings.
Capillary BNP may enable point-of-care testing; leaves open equivalence to venous BNP without prospective validation.
Background Capillary B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) testing is attractive in outpatient and emergency settings. The aim of this study was to perform an evaluation of the clinical performances of capillary BNP testing as compared with venous whole blood and plasma point-of-care (POC) BNP as well as plasma N-terminal (NT) proBNP central laboratory testing. Methods BNP was measured with a novel single epitope POC assay (Minicare® BV, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) and NT-proBNP with a central laboratory assay (Roche Diagnostics®, Vienna, Austria). Results BNP and NT-proBNP were measured in 269 patients of a Department of Cardiology (mean age 67.9 ± 13 years, 26.4% females). Capillary BNP very closely correlated with whole blood venous BNP (r = 0.99, p < 0.001). There was also a close correlation of plasma BNP and NT-proBNP concentrations (r = 0.79, p < 0.001). The diagnostic performances of capillary BNP, whole blood venous BNP, plasma BNP and plasma NT-proBNP for acute heart failure (areas under receiver operating characteristic curves [AUC ROC]: 0.73-0.77) or systolic left ventricular dysfunction in the whole study population (AUC ROC: 0.72-0.76) did not differ significantly. All were significant independent predictors of cardiovascular death during follow-up of the whole study population. Conclusions Our study for the first time demonstrated a very close correlation of capillary and venous whole blood or plasma BNP concentrations using the same BNP assay in a large patient cohort. The diagnostic performances of different BNP specimens did not differ significantly, and no significant differences between BNP and NT-proBNP were found either.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schreinlechner et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Cardiology patients (acute heart failure or systolic left ventricular dysfunction) (n=269). Capillary B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) testing vs. Venous whole blood BNP, plasma BNP, and plasma NT-proBNP was evaluated on Correlation of capillary BNP with whole blood venous BNP (r = 0.99, p=<0.001). Capillary BNP testing very closely correlated with whole blood venous BNP (r = 0.99, p < 0.001) and demonstrated similar diagnostic performance for acute heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: