Why the study?
Does chronic clonidine monotherapy improve left ventricular structure and function in male patients with essential hypertension?
Does chronic clonidine monotherapy improve left ventricular structure and function in male patients with essential hypertension?
Long-term clonidine monotherapy in essential hypertension reduces blood pressure and regresses LV hypertrophy, but does not reliably improve diastolic or systolic LV function.
Should not yet change practice for LV function in hypertension; leaves open whether mass regression improves outcomes in randomized trials.
To determine whether alterations of left ventricular (LV) structure are associated with improved LV function under chronic clonidine monotherapy (300-450 g/day) of essential hypertension, 11 male patients (age range 47-61 years) were followed for 5.4 +/- 0.9 months using echocardiography and Doppler echocardiography. Blood pressure decreased from a mean of 168/105 to 150/96 mmHg (p less than 0.01), heart rate remained unchanged (73 +/- 10 vs. 71 +/- 10 beats/min). LV muscle mass decreased from 350 +/- 73 to 297 +/- 56 g (p less than 0.02), LV volume/muscle mass ratio increased from 0.58 +/- 0.13 to 0.69 +/- 0.12 ml/g (p less than 0.005). Ejection time increased from 276 +/- 17 to 296 +/- 17 ms (p less than 0.01), whereas no significant change was found for pre-ejection period, ejection fraction, cardiac index and LV dimensions. Doppler analysis revealed improved isovolumic relaxation time (116 +/- 17 vs. 84 +/- 28 ms; p less than 0.05), but no change in isovolumic contraction duration, maximal inflow velocities, time-velocity integrals and their duration, rate of acceleration and deceleration of early and atrial filling, and of their ratios. It is concluded that no reliable improvement in diastolic or systolic LV function is observed in chronic clonidine monotherapy of essential hypertension despite a normalization of blood pressure and a regression of LV hypertrophy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hüting et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: