Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper introduces a new dataset on regional authority in 42 democracies for 1950–2006 and formulates five hypotheses. First, an S-curve effect describing a logistic association between the population of a country and its regional authority. Secondly, a heteroskedasticity effect, in which the variance in regional authority among larger countries is greater than that among smaller countries. Thirdly, an identity effect, in which the allocation of authority to a jurisdiction is influenced by the relative strength of a population's identity to the community encompassed by the jurisdiction. Fourthly, a democracy effect, which leads democracies to have higher levels of regional authority than dictatorships. Fifthly, an integration effect, which removes a potential economic cost on regionalization by providing a transnational frame for economic exchange.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marks et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: