Compares language screening accuracy in children, highlighting test effectiveness for identifying impairments.
No AccessLanguage, Speech, and Hearing Services in SchoolsResearch Article1 Jan 1983Two Language Screening Tests Compared with Developmental Sentence Scoring Lynn Blaxley, Margo Clinker and Genese Warr-Leeper Lynn Blaxley Google Scholar More articles by this author , Margo Clinker Google Scholar More articles by this author and Genese Warr-Leeper Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461.1401.38 SectionsAboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In The performance of 90 children between the ages of 4 and 6 years on two language screening tests was compared with their performance on Developmental Sentence Scoring to determine the accuracy of these screening tests in identifying language impairments. The Bankson Language Screening Test was generally accurate in the identification of language-impaired children while the Fluharty Preschool Speech and Language Screening Test failed to identify a large proportion of these children. Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research64:2 (593-612)17 Feb 2021Tense Marking in the Kindergarten Population: Testing the Bimodal Distribution HypothesisBrian Weiler and C. Melanie SchueleLanguage, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools50:4 (673-682)10 Oct 2019Concurrent Validity of the Fluharty Preschool Speech and Language Screening Test–Second Edition at Age 3: Comparison With Four Diagnostic MeasuresSarita Eisenberg, Kristen Victorino and Sarah MurrayLanguage, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools49:2 (248-259)5 Apr 2018A Multiyear Population-Based Study of Kindergarten Language Screening Failure Rates Using the Rice Wexler Test of Early Grammatical ImpairmentBrian Weiler, C. Melanie Schuele, Jacob I. Feldman and Hannah KrimmAmerican Journal of Speech-Language Pathology24:3 (426-437)1 Aug 2015Utility of a Language Screening Measure for Predicting Risk for Language Impairment in BilingualsMirza J. Lugo-Neris, Elizabeth D. Peña, Lisa M. Bedore and Ronald B. Gillam Volume 14Issue 1January 1983Pages: 38-46 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library HistoryReceived: Aug 12, 1980Accepted: Aug 10, 1981 Published in issue: Jan 1, 1983 Metrics Downloaded 20 times Topicsasha-topicsasha-article-typesCopyright & PermissionsCopyright © 1983 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationLoading ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Blaxley et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: