Key result
Anthropometrics, METS-VF, BIA, and ultrasound offer potentially cost-effective and adaptable methods to estimate visceral adiposity.
Why the study?
Visceral adiposity is linked to insulin resistance and cardiometabolic diseases, and its measurement helps assess obesity disorders and guide reversal interventions.
What are the cost-effective and adaptable measures for estimating visceral adiposity?
What are the cost-effective and adaptable measures for estimating visceral adiposity?
Simple anthropometric and ultrasound-based measures offer cost-effective alternatives to MRI for estimating visceral adiposity in clinical practice.
May support accessible visceral adiposity screening in practice; leaves open prospective validation against gold-standard imaging.
BackgroundObesity is a major public health problem these days. Obesity, specifically visceral adiposity is linked to insulin resistance and an increased risk of cardiometabolic diseases. Measurement of visceral adiposity helps to understand the prevalence of obesity disorders and strategize interventions targeting its reversal.MethodsA literature search was done to identify studies that looked at the quantification and estimation of visceral adiposity published from January 1990 to May 2023. Online databases PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus were used for the literature search.FindingsVarious cost-effective methods are available for the estimation of visceral adiposity. Simple anthropometric measurements like the waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio are useful to estimate visceral adiposity during a routine clinical examination. The novel Metabolic score for Visceral Fat Estimation (METS-VF) has the potential for widespread clinical use but remains to be validated in different populations. Ultrasound-based estimation of visceral adiposity strongly correlates with quantification by MRI. However, it is operator dependent and requires strict adherence to established measurement protocols.ConclusionAnthropometric measurements of waist circumference, waist-to-height ratio, the METS-VF score, BIA, and USG-based assessment of visceral and ectopic fat depots are potentially cost-effective and adaptable measures of estimation of visceral adiposity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mathew et al. (2023) conducted a review in Obesity and visceral adiposity. Cost-effective measures of visceral adiposity estimation (anthropometry, METS-VF, BIA, USG) was evaluated. Anthropometric measurements, METS-VF score, BIA, and ultrasound are potentially cost-effective and adaptable measures for estimating visceral adiposity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: