Key result
Real-time three-dimensional stress echocardiography offers advantages over 2D imaging by allowing the acquisition of all left ventricular segments from a single echo window in one capture.
Why the study?
Does real-time three-dimensional (3D) stress echocardiography improve the detection of ischemia in patients with ischemic heart disease compared to 2D stress echocardiography?
Does real-time three-dimensional (3D) stress echocardiography improve the detection of ischemia in patients with ischemic heart disease compared to 2D stress echocardiography?
Real-time 3D stress echocardiography provides a single-capture, single-window alternative to 2D imaging, potentially improving the detection of ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease.
May facilitate single-window LV acquisition during stress echo; leaves open whether it improves ischemia detection versus 2D.
Two-dimensional (2D) stress echocardiography is well established in the assessment of patients with ischemic heart disease. However, in a number of patients, this technique results in nondiagnostic tests due to limited time available at peak stress to capture wall motion abnormalities. In order to obtain all segments of the left ventricle, the sonographer is expected to acquire multiple echocardiography views from multiple windows. The changes in heart rate during acquisition and the technical challenges in exactly matching the stress with the baseline 2D echocardiographic views may adversely impact the sensitivity of the test. Real-time three-dimensional (3D) stress echocardiography offers advantages in acquisition of all images from one echo window in a single capture, with the technique relatively easy to master. The current review will describe the 3D stress echocardiography technique, its advantages, and limitations. Additionally, the future direction of 3D stress echocardiography in detecting ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease will be discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berbarie et al. (2018) conducted a review in Ischemic heart disease. Real-time three-dimensional (3D) stress echocardiography vs. Two-dimensional (2D) stress echocardiography was evaluated. Real-time three-dimensional stress echocardiography offers advantages over 2D imaging by allowing the acquisition of all left ventricular segments from a single echo window in one capture.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: