Key result
Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography during treadmill stress significantly reduced image acquisition time compared to two-dimensional echocardiography (35.2 vs 51.6 seconds, P<0.05).
Why the study?
Is contrast-enhanced real-time three-dimensional echocardiography feasible and faster than 2D echocardiography during exercise treadmill stress testing in a low-risk population?
Cross-Sectional (n=39)
Single-blind
No
Is contrast-enhanced real-time three-dimensional echocardiography feasible and faster than 2D echocardiography during exercise treadmill stress testing in a low-risk population?
Absolute Event Rate: 35.2% vs 51.6%
p-value: p=<0.05
Contrast-enhanced real-time 3D echocardiography is feasible during treadmill stress testing and reduces image acquisition time compared to standard 2D imaging.
Supports feasibility of 3D echocardiography in treadmill stress; leaves open effects on diagnostic accuracy and outcomes.
Although emerging data support the utility of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) during dobutamine stress testing, the feasibility of performing contrast enhanced RT3DE during exercise treadmill stress has not been explored. Two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) acquisition were performed in 39 patients at rest and peak exercise. Contrast was used in 29 patients (74%). Reconstruction was performed manually by generating short axis cut planes at the base, mid-ventricle and apex, and automatically by generating 9 short axis slices. Three-dimensional acquisition was feasible during rest and stress regardless of the use of contrast. Time to acquire stress images was reduced using 3D (35.2±17.9 s) as compared to 2D acquisition (51.6±14.7 s; P<0.05). Using a 17-segment model, of all 663 segments, 588 resting (88.6%) and 563 stress segments (84.9%) were adequately visualized using manually reconstructed 3D data, compared with 618 resting (93.2%) and 606 stress segments (91.4%) using 2D data (P rest=0.06; P stress=0.07). We concluded that contrast enhanced RT3DE is feasible during treadmill stress echocardiography.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kort et al. (2010) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary artery disease (suspected) (n=39). Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) vs. Two-dimensional exercise stress echocardiography (2DSE) was evaluated on Time to acquire stress images (p=<0.05). Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography during treadmill stress significantly reduced image acquisition time compared to two-dimensional echocardiography (35.2 vs 51.6 seconds, P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: