Key result
Real-time 3D dobutamine stress echocardiography showed similar accuracy to 2D methods for detecting coronary artery disease but required shorter scanning times.
Why the study?
Does RT3D-DSE provide comparable diagnostic accuracy and faster scanning time compared to 2D-DSE for detecting myocardial ischaemia in patients with suspected ischaemia?
Cross-Sectional (n=56)
Does RT3D-DSE provide comparable diagnostic accuracy and faster scanning time compared to 2D-DSE for detecting myocardial ischaemia in patients with suspected ischaemia?
RT3D-DSE is a feasible and faster alternative to 2D-DSE that provides comparable diagnostic accuracy for detecting myocardial ischaemia.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
RT3D-DSE may shorten stress echocardiography workflows; leaves open need for prospective validation before routine adoption.
AIMS: Although two-dimensional-dobutamine stress echocardiography (2D-DSE) is useful for the diagnosis of myocardial ischaemia, it requires the acquisition of multiple cross-sections at each stage. The introduction of new real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) offers rapid acquisition and 3D display of the entire left ventricle (LV). The purpose was to evaluate real-time three-dimensional-dobutamine stress echocardiography (RT3D-DSE) for the diagnosis of ischaemia using exercise (201)Tl single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) as the reference standard, in comparison with 2D-DSE. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed DSE in 56 consecutive patients who had undergone SPECT because of suspected ischaemia. 3D images by RT3DE were acquired from the apical window after the acquisition of cross-sectional images at every stage of 2D-DSE. Wall motion analysis in RT3DE was performed from anatomical images by cropping the acquired full volume data sets. Mean scanning time for adequate image acquisition at peak stress by RT3D-DSE was shorter than that by 2D-DSE (29+/-4 vs. 68+/-6 s, P<0.0001). RT3DE provided adequate images at success rate of 92% at rest and 89% at peak stress, whereas two-dimensional echocardiography did at 94 and 90%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of RT3D-DSE for the detection of coronary artery disease are 86, 80, and 82%, respectively. Those of 2D-DSE are 86, 83, and 84%, respectively. There were no significant differences in the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy between these two methods (P=1.000). CONCLUSION: RT3D-DSE offers rapid and simple acquisition of the entire LV wall motion and provides feasible and accurate assessment of myocardial ischaemia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matsumura et al. (2005) conducted a cross-sectional in Suspected myocardial ischaemia (n=56). Real-time three-dimensional dobutamine stress echocardiography (RT3D-DSE) vs. Two-dimensional dobutamine stress echocardiography (2D-DSE) was evaluated on Accuracy for the detection of coronary artery disease (p=1.000). Real-time 3D dobutamine stress echocardiography showed similar accuracy to 2D methods for detecting coronary artery disease but required shorter scanning times.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: