Key result
Real-time 3D adenosine stress echocardiography had 82% sensitivity and 64% specificity for detecting CAD via wall-motion analysis, compared to 80% and 82% for 2D echocardiography.
Why the study?
Does real-time three-dimensional adenosine stress contrast echocardiography improve diagnostic accuracy for CAD compared to two-dimensional echocardiography in patients with known or suspected CAD?
Population
60 patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), mean age 60.1 ± 8.5 years, 38 men.
Comparison
Real-time three-dimensional adenosine stress… vs Two-dimensional adenosine stress contrast…
Design
Cross-sectional
Authors
Loading...
May not replace 2D echocardiography due to lower specificity; leaves open need for prospective validation in CAD detection.
Observational (n=60)
Does real-time three-dimensional adenosine stress contrast echocardiography improve diagnostic accuracy for CAD compared to two-dimensional echocardiography in patients with known or suspected CAD?
Real-time 3D adenosine stress echocardiography is a feasible technique with comparable sensitivity to 2D echocardiography for evaluating myocardial wall motion and perfusion in suspected CAD.
Aggeli et al. (2011) conducted an observational in known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) (n=60). Real-time three-dimensional (RT3D) adenosine stress contrast echocardiography vs. Two-dimensional (2D) adenosine stress contrast echocardiography was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) for detecting CAD. Real-time 3D adenosine stress echocardiography had 82% sensitivity and 64% specificity for detecting CAD via wall-motion analysis, compared to 80% and 82% for 2D echocardiography.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: