Key result
Transitional carriers of FMDV showed upregulated Th17-stimulating cytokines and AHR signaling, and downregulated neutrophil-recruiting chemokines compared to animals that cleared the infection.
Why the study?
Foot-and-mouth disease virus can persistently infect pharyngeal epithelia in ruminants, prompting analysis of differentially expressed genes during the transitional phase when animals diverge into carriers or terminators.
Observational
Identifies immune signatures of FMDV carriage; leaves open whether Th17/AHR modulation prevents persistence in livestock.
Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) can persistently infect pharyngeal epithelia in ruminants but not in pigs. Our previous studies demonstrated that persistent FMDV infection in cattle was associated with under-expression of several chemokines that recruit immune cells. This report focuses on the analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEG) identified during the transitional phase of infection, defined as the period when animals diverge between becoming carriers or terminators. During this phase, Th17-stimulating cytokines (IL6 and IL23A) and Th17-recruiting chemokines (CCL14 and CCL20) were upregulated in animals that were still infected (transitional carriers) compared to those that had recently cleared infection (terminators), whereas chemokines recruiting neutrophils and CD8+ T effector cells (CCL3 and ELR+CXCLs) were downregulated. Upregulated Th17-specific receptor, CCR6, and Th17-associated genes, CD146, MIR155, and ThPOK, suggested increased Th17 cell activity in transitional carriers. However, a complex interplay of the Th17 regulatory axis was indicated by non-significant upregulation of IL17A and downregulation of IL17F, two hallmarks of TH17 activity. Other DEG suggested that transitional carriers had upregulated aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR), non-canonical NFκB signaling, and downregulated canonical NFκB signaling. The results described herein provide novel insights into the mechanisms of establishment of FMDV persistence. Additionally, the fact that ruminants, unlike pigs, produce a large amount of AHR ligands suggests a plausible explanation of why FMDV persists in ruminants, but not in pigs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) infection in cattle. Transitional carriers (persistent FMDV infection) vs. Terminators (recently cleared infection) was evaluated on Differentially expressed genes (DEG) in the nasopharyngeal mucosa. Transitional carriers of FMDV showed upregulated Th17-stimulating cytokines and AHR signaling, and downregulated neutrophil-recruiting chemokines compared to animals that cleared the infection.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: