Key result
Cognitive impairment linked to ~11% higher death or MI risk per SPMSQ error after ACS.
Why the study?
Frailty marks poor prognosis in older adults after acute coronary syndrome, but whether cognitive impairment provides additional prognostic information was unknown.
Does cognitive impairment provide additional prognostic information on top of frailty for predicting mortality or acute myocardial infarction in older adults after acute coronary syndrome?
Cohort (n=342)
No
Does cognitive impairment provide additional prognostic information on top of frailty for predicting mortality or acute myocardial infarction in older adults after acute coronary syndrome?
Hazard Ratio: 1.11 (95% CI 1.04–1.19)
p-value: p=0.002
Cognitive impairment provides independent long-term prognostic value for mortality and myocardial infarction on top of frailty in older adults surviving an acute coronary syndrome.
May enhance post-ACS risk stratification beyond frailty in older adults; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Frailty is a marker of poor prognosis in older adults after acute coronary syndrome. We investigated whether cognitive impairment provides additional prognostic information. The study population consisted of a prospective cohort of 342 older (>65 years) adult survivors after acute coronary syndrome. Frailty (Fried score) and cognitive function (Pfeiffer’s Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire—SPMSQ) were assessed at discharge. The endpoints were mortality or acute myocardial infarction at 8.7-year median follow-up. Patient distribution according to SPMSQ results was: no cognitive impairment (SPMSQ = 0 errors; n = 248, 73%), mild impairment (SPMSQ = 1–2 errors; n = 52, 15%), and moderate to severe impairment (SPMSQ ≥3 errors; n = 42, 12%). A total of 245 (72%) patients died or had an acute myocardial infarction, and 216 (63%) patients died. After adjustment for clinical data, comorbidities, and Fried score, the SPMSQ added prognostic value for death or myocardial infarction (per number of errors; HR = 1.11, 95%, CI 1.04–1.19, p = 0.002) and death (HR = 1.11, 95% 1.03–1.20, p = 0.007). An SPMSQ with ≥3 errors identified the highest risk subgroup. Geriatric conditions (SPSMQ and Fried score) explained 19% and 43% of the overall chi-square of the models for predicting death or myocardial infarction and death, respectively. Geriatric assessment after acute coronary syndrome should include both frailty and cognitive function. This is particularly important given that cognitive impairment without dementia can be subclinical and thus remain undetected.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sanchís et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Acute coronary syndrome (n=342). Cognitive impairment (SPMSQ score) vs. No cognitive impairment was evaluated on Mortality or acute myocardial infarction (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.04-1.19, p=0.002). Cognitive impairment independently predicted long-term mortality or acute myocardial infarction in older adults after acute coronary syndrome, with an 11% increased risk per SPMSQ error (HR 1.11).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: