Why the study?
To incorporate smartwatches in routine medical care, their reliability in obtaining precordial leads needed to be validated against standard ECGs.
Does a smartwatch reliably obtain precordial lead ECG recordings compared to a standard 12-lead ECG in participants with sinus rhythm?
Does a smartwatch reliably obtain precordial lead ECG recordings compared to a standard 12-lead ECG in participants with sinus rhythm?
A smartwatch can feasibly and reliably record precordial lead ECGs without assistance, offering a valid alternative to standard ECGs.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support unassisted smartwatch precordial ECGs; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
The Apple Watch is capable of recording single-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs). To incorporate such devices in routine medical care, the reliability of such devices to obtain precordial leads needs to be validated. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and reliability of a smartwatch (SW) to obtain precordial leads compared to standard ECGs. We included 100 participants (62 male, aged 62.8 ± 13.1 years) with sinus rhythm and recorded a standard 12-lead ECG and the precordial leads with the Apple Watch. The ECGs were quantitively compared. A total of 98 patients were able to record precordial leads without assistance. A strong correlation was observed between the amplitude of the standard and SW-ECGs’ waves, in terms of P waves, QRS-complexes, and T waves (all p-values < 0.01). A significant correlation was observed between the two methods regarding the duration of the ECG waves (all p-values < 0.01). Assessment of polarity showed a significant and a strong concordance between the ECGs’ waves in all six leads (91–100%, all p-values < 0.001). In conclusion, 98% of patients were able to record precordial leads using a SW without assistance. The SW is feasible and reliable for obtaining valid precordial-lead ECG recordings as a validated alternative to a standard ECG.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sprenger et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: