PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 1981Circulation229 citations

Quantitative detection of regional left ventricular contraction abnormalities by two-dimensional echocardiography. I. Analysis of methods.

View Full Paper
PMP F MoynihanAPA F ParisiCFCharles L. Feldman

Structured PICO

Do area-based methods improve reproducibility and reduce variability in quantifying regional LV function by 2-D echo compared to linear methods?

P
Population
Heterogeneous patient population and a homogeneous normal population
I
Intervention
Area-based methods for quantifying regional left ventricular function from 2-D echocardiographic images
C
Comparator
Linear methods (hemiaxis and perimeter measurements)
O
Outcome
Interobserver reproducibility and variability of regional functionsurrogate

Area-based methods are superior to linear methods for evaluating regional LV function with 2-D echocardiography due to better reproducibility and lower variability.

Abstract

Different approaches to the quantification of regional left ventricular (LV) function from two-dimensional echocardiographic (2-D echo) images were assessed for their ability to optimize interobserver reproducibility in a heterogeneous patient population and to minimize the variability of regional function observed in a homogeneous normal population. Areas, hemiaxis and perimeter measurements were examined, as were the effect of the degree of image subdivision into halves, quadrants or octants. Each approach was also tested using both a fixed and a floating frame of reference for the definition of a regional-axis system. The area method was consistently superior to either linear method in optimizing both reproducibility and variability. Reproducibility decreased inversely with the degree of subdivision. The axis-system frame of reference had no effect on reproducibility. The floating-axis system yielded the same variability as the fixed system for short-axis sections at the mitral valve level, but slightly less variability for a papillary muscle level section. We conclude that area-based methods are superior for the evaluation of regional LV function with 2-D echo, but the degree of subdivision of the image and the frame of reference chosen do not greatly affect reproducibility or variability and should be chosen based on their performance in a well-defined clinical population.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Moynihan et al. (1981) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1dfee349e88a0d41606e21https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.63.4.752
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper